WORLD TRADE CENTER COLLAPSES: EVIDENCE-BASED RESEARCH

This website contains:

The most accurate visual reconstructions of the collapses of WTC1 and 2 that exist, identifying the collapse progression mechanisms of World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 (WTC1 and WTC2).

The only accurate, detailed mapping of the earliest movements of each building available (anywhere). Detailed reconstruction of the moments leading up to and during the collapse initiations of each building is used to fact-check claims made by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in their official reports on the collapses and claims made by other organizations and individuals.

Detailed critique of the official reports on WTC1, 2 and WTC7 by the NIST, showing that claims made within the reports on all 3 buildings directly contradict what can be verified through the visual record.

Video series explaining how the Twin Towers collapse progression mechanisms were switched out with a cartoon in 2007 and how the capacity to communicate and think intelligibly about the Twin Towers collapses has effectively been 'shut off'.

Detailed descriptions of how professional/academic publications have misrepresented the collapse modes of the Twin Towers from 2001 to the present. Identification of the 3 original sources of all professional/academic misrepresentations of the Twin Tower collapse modes. The most accurate reviews and critiques of academic and professional papers on the World Trade Center collapses that exist.

Detailed critique of how Wikipedia has misrepresented the collapse modes of the Twin Towers from 2004 to the present.

Direct proof that the actual Twin Towers collapse modes and their historic records have been successfully removed from public, academic and professional conciousness. They have been replaced by cartoonish abstractions experienced as artificially narrowed sets of binaries (as NIST, Dr Bazant vs Dr Jones, Richard Gage vs Dr Wood, Dr Fetzer). The human mind has successfully been 'shut off' on this subject.

Links to the largest and most complete collections of video and photographic evidence of the attacks, collapses and resulting debris available to the public.

Detailed critique of how both private corporate and alternative media and investigative journalists have misrepresented the collapse modes of the Twin Towers to the public from 2001 to the present. Open letters of protest to various news organizations about their misrepresentations of the Twin Towers collapse modes from 2001 to the present.

Why preserve an independent, detailed visual record of the events at the World Trade Center complex on September 11, 2001?

Without an accurate and detailed visual record of what really happened, there is no way to independently verify the truth of any claim made by official or non-official sources.

Re-examination of the complete visual record is the only way to distinguish between false claims and the true events. Without such re-examination, any false claims can be made by any party for any reason, and there is no way of knowing or verifying what actually happened independently from the sea of false claims that have been established since 2001.

For this reason the visual record was re-constructed and re-examined as completely as possible in this website. Visual records and mappings were preserved so that people affected by the events of September 11, 2001 can fact-check what they have been told independently, free from the bias of governments or groups with their own personal motivations and interpretations.

The website is written in a way that discourages blind belief in any authoritative source (no matter how paternal). The website encourages sincere fact-checking by re-examination of direct visual evidence by people who have the skills and interest to do so. All observed features are presented in a way that gives any able reader the opportunity to verify information for themselves. All observations and measurements should be reproducible and testable by any capable person or organization. Links are provided to all source video from which measurements were taken so any capable reader can directly cross-check results.

Preservation and re-construction of the complete visual record is all the more essential because by doing so anyone can verify that the historical explanations of each collapse are verifiably untrue. The final reports on each collapse provided by U.S. Government agencies (the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)), contain (verifiably) gross errors. Errors can be confirmed by comparing claims made within each report with the extant visual record. Moreover, no government agency or academic body acknowledges (or seems to recognize) that gross errors exist in their records from 2005 to the present.

Gross errors are easily spotted once the visual record of events are re-assembled and re-viewed.

This website brings together the work of a number of independent researchers who actively shared their own discoveries and observations from around 2006 to 2013. Credit for research: Some former members of 'The 9/11 Forum' (forum currently archived), Femr2, Achimspok, OneWhiteEye, Enik, Matt, other helpful contributors. Many ideas were taken from from comments made on 'The 9/11 Forum' and various forums where interesting research was shared.

Object tracking and sub-pixel measuring techniques were applied by 3 researchers independently of each other (for purposes of cross-checking results). Most every animated gif and video were created by others.

The author of this website was able to collect a record of movement of all 3 collapsed buildings that was verifiably superior to and grossly contradicted the record provided by U.S. Government agencies. I was able to correspond with other independent researchers who provided measurements and documented observables on a level far more intricate than that which previously existed. This website is a compilation of the collected data.

Quarter Century Study of Human Perception of the Twin Towers Collapse Modes

There is direct proof that the actual Twin Towers collapse modes and their historic record have been successfully removed from public, academic and professional consciousness and have been replaced by cartoonish abstractions.

Common binary default modes of beliefs firmly entrenched and normalized in popular and professional culture after 25 years are as follows:

1) Twin Towers collapse progressions are described as crushing blocks (crush down of lower block, then crush up of upper block as the official story or 'debunking' position.

2) Twin Towers demolition is described as thermite vs DEW by default with no other option as the 'truther' position.

3) Twin Towers collapse progressions are described being comparable to an erupting volcano (due to distinct Twin Towers collapse progression features).

These beliefs have been normalized as default beliefs for 2 key reasons:

1) A lack of primary research fact-checking tools or independent efforts to verify or refute claims

2) Total passive deference to technical authority (the kiss of death of Twin Towers independent research and inquiry)

At the logical heart of the system is a binary ('truther' vs 'debunker') presented and perceived as artificially narrowed sets of binaries or a 'trinary' (as NIST, Dr Bazant vs Dr Jones, Richard Gage vs Dr Wood, Dr Fetzer).

This triple steering of the Twin Towers collapse narrative and human perception by using sets of binaries is firmly entrenched in popular culture.

How to verify the weakness of the system through 25th anniversary events, statements, claims and through 'debunker' and 'truther' key source material leading up to and during 25th anniversary events.

The system can be fact-checked through a 2 step process:

1) Construct accurate reconstructions and mappings of collapse features through primary research (already done on this website).

2) Use mappings as toolsets to directly verify or refute all claims.

What would one discover?

The artificially narrowed nature of the binaries would be revealed.

But these common binary beliefs form the foundational world views of the general public and professional-academic communities on the Twin Towers collapses right now (more than 25 years after the collapses).

It is this triple steering of the Twin Towers collapse narrative (as NIST, Dr Bazant vs Dr Jones, Richard Gage vs Dr Wood, Dr Fetzer) that forms the default, unquestioned world views in popular, academic and professional cultures even a quarter century after the collapses.

These examples illustrate that the act of deferring judgment to a technical authority is 'the kiss of death' of ones ability to think critically on the subject of the Twin Towers collapses.

For these reasons one can understand why primary research that allows one to independently fact-check narrative claims, beliefs and perceptions is a prime target of those who wish to control the complete narrative (through control of all binary sets).

About the author of this website.

Copyright Creative Commons 4.0